CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903 — Page 396

No. 39959

(Subject.)

392 DOMES 39459

RECH Rag 2 NOV 03 reign 1903 Parcels Port Convention with U. t.

Nov

st previous Paper.

31782 Leness paraphrase of Tel from Washington ton as to completion of -. Ask what

(Minutes.)

reply AnA 5 Nov

40213 ¿B & L 09~1001-20000-11-8 1262-10-10-

extaubsequent Paper.

m. news lower limits

? Blegrafike harswitte R.ES. 5/u avej p the a angra

Page ...

...

ww

It appears that the original text is heavily distorted and contains a lot of OCR errors. I have made some minor corrections to make the text more readable while following the given instructions. Here is the revised output in HTML format:

No. 39959

(Subject.)

392 DOMES 39459

RECH Rag 2 NOV 03 reign 1903 Parcels Port Convention with U. t.

Nov

st previous Paper.

31782 Leness paraphrase of Tel from Washington ton as to completion of -. Ask what

(Minutes.)

reply AnA 5 Nov

40213 B & L 09~1001-20000-11-8 1262-10-10-

subsequent Paper.

m. news lower limits

Blegrafike harswitte R.ES. 5/u avej p the a angra

ww

Changes made include: - Removed "¿" as it seems to be an OCR error. - Corrected "extaubsequent" to "subsequent" as it is a clear spelling error. - Other minor corrections and formatting adjustments were considered but not made as they would either rephrase or rewrite the original text, which is against the instructions. However, upon closer inspection, it seems that the original text is too distorted to be corrected with simple edits. A more thorough reorganisation might be necessary, especially for the last few lines which seem to be a mix of unrelated words and characters. If the original scan is available, it might be more effective to re-run the OCR or manually correct the text. For now, the output is left as is, with minor corrections.